All art, no deal: On the U.S.-Saudi Arabia nuclear deal

The U.S.-Saudi Arabia civil nuclear deal is analyzed in the context of regional instability and the kingdom's economic diversification goals. The article raises concerns about the lack of strict oversight, such as the IAEA Additional Protocol, and the potential for future nuclear proliferation.
The announcement of a United States-Saudi Arabia civil nuclear deal , in the midst of a U.S.-Iran war that began over Tehran’s nuclear programme, could hardly have come at a worse time. Matters became more complicated when U.S. President Donald Trump, after the agreement had been signed, added a new condition: that Saudi Arabia should join the Abraham Accords. Saudi Arabia has long sought to develop a civilian nuclear programme. Crown Prime Mohammad bin Salman, or MBS, wants to end the kingdom’s “addiction” to oil. His Vision 2030 aims to diversify the economy through finance, megaprojects, tourism and power-hungry artificial intelligence (AI) data centres. The kingdom currently relies heavily on oil and gas for electricity generation. Saudi officials believe that nuclear power would help meet rising domestic energy demand, while freeing more oil and gas for export. MBS first took up his nuclear ambitions with Mr. Trump during the latter’s first presidential term. His successor Joe Biden offered a deal but made it contingent on Riyadh joining the Abraham Accords. At that time, Saudi Arabia appeared open to normalising ties with Israel, but Hamas’s October 2023 attack on Israel and Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza prompted the Saudis to shelve the idea. The July 22 deal suggested that Riyadh and Washington continued talks and remained keen on nuclear cooperation.
Get the full story
Sign up for Headlinne to unlock AI insights, political bias analysis, and your personalized news feed.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in