The Hindu·4 min read·hard

Allahabad HC split on ‘bulldozer justice’: So what divided the Bench | Explained

I
Ishita Mishra
Allahabad HC split on ‘bulldozer justice’: So what divided the Bench | Explained
AI Summary

The Allahabad High Court is currently split on the legality of 'bulldozer justice,' where authorities demolish properties associated with criminal suspects. While both judges agree on curbing arbitrary demolitions, they differ on the extent of the court's power to create new legal safeguards.

The story so far: The Allahabad High Court’s decision in a recent case title: Faimuddeen v.s State of Uttar Pradesh , has resulted in a split verdict even when the Bench agreed on the need to curb arbitrary demolitions. The two judges, Justice Atul Sreedharan and Justice Siddharth Nandan, however, differed on how far the High Court can go in creating additional safeguards beyond those already laid down by the Supreme Court.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicssocial justice

Get the full story

Sign up for Headlinne to unlock AI insights, political bias analysis, and your personalized news feed.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

Allahabad HC split on ‘bulldozer justice’: So what divided the Bench | Explained — Headlinne — headlinne