Don't Introduce Third Language In Class 9, It's Stressful To Students: Justice BV Nagarathna To Centre

Supreme Court judge Justice BV Nagarathna on Thursday expressed concern over the introduction of a third language at the Class 9 level under the CBSE curriculum, observing that it places unnecessary stress on students preparing for board examinations.The remarks were made during the hearing of the Tamil Nadu government's appeal against a Madras High Court direction to facilitate the establishment of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs) in every district of the State. Tamil Nadu has consistently opposed the setting up of JNVs, citing concerns over the three-language policy followed by the schools.Although the validity of the CBSE language policy was not directly in issue in the case, Justice Nagarathna made a series of observations on the timing of introducing a third language. Notably, the CBSE three-language policy is presently under challenge in separate public interest petitions before a Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant. The CJI's bench has refused to stay the implementation of the CBSE's policy, and has posted the matter for hearing next week. .desktop-ad { display: block; } .mobile-ad { display: none; } @media (max-width: 767px) { .desktop-ad { display: none; } .mobile-ad { display: block; } } .ad_unit_wrapper { text-align: center; margin-top: 10px; } .insidecontent-ad-img { width: 728px; height: 220px; max-width: 100%; object-fit: cover; display: block; margin: 0 auto; } @media only screen and (max-width: 768px) { .insidecontent-ad-img { width: 100%; height: auto; } } During the hearing, counsel for Tamil Nadu submitted that the State's objection related to the three-language policy.Justice Nagarathna observed that the policy did not mandate Hindi as the third language."The State language has to be taught, English has to be taught and any third language. It doesn't say Hindi," she remarked.Adv G Priyadarshini, the counsel for the respondent (the NGO petitioner in High Court), pointed out that the National Education Policy specifically provides that no language should be imposed on any State. Justice Nagarathna then asked the State, "You don't want Hindi, but if it's Sanskrit, what is the issue?". Counsel for the State responded that the third language becomes compulsory only from Class 9.Reacting to this, Justice Nagarathna said:"No, that is very bad. Ninth standard is stressful. Why do you introduce a new language in 9th? You introduce it in 6th."Drawing from her own schooling, the judge recalled that students in her school were exposed to multiple curricula and began learning the third language during middle school."In the middle school the third language was started because that was required for SSLC. It was Kannada for those who had second language as Hindi and vice versa. Sanskrit was also there, so you could have third language. The earlier, the better," she observed.Addressing the Union government, Justice Nagarathna said:"Union of India, please don't have third language in 9th standard. CBSE, ICSE, State Board, 10th standard is a board exam. From the end of 8th standard onwards, the pressure starts."Recalling her own academic experience from the 1970s, she added that students were introduced to Class 10 concepts as early as Class 8 to prepare them for board examinations."So if we had that kind of preparation and all, what about today's students? Don't start a new language in 9th. Start it in 6th... I'm recalling my experience from 1976," she said.The judge also advised the Tamil Nadu government against rejecting Central schemes merely because they originate from the Union government."You may have your education system, but don't prevent the Central government schools," she told the State, later adding, "Don't have this attitude that it is the Union government, so why should we accept it."The Bench, also comprising Justice R Mahadevan, noted that discussions between the Union and the State were still underway regarding the establishment of Navodaya schools."Talks have not concluded. If that fails, then only a question of us addressing any merits arises," the Bench observed.The respondent pointed out that despite an earlier direction requiring the State to identify land for the schools within six weeks, Tamil Nadu was now seeking further time. The State sought six weeks to obtain instructions.Observing that there had been "a change of guard" at the State (TVK came into power after replacing DMK in May following the Assembly elections), Justice Nagarathna remarked that it remained to be seen what policy approach the new government would adopt.The matter has been posted for further hearing on August 11.BackgroundThe matter concerns the Tamil Nadu Government's challenge to a Madras High Court judgment directing the establishment of a Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya (JNV) in every district of the State. The High Court had...