Article may be outdated

This article is 7 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

The Hindu·4 min read·medium

‘Haram for one, halal for another’: Jaleel questions IUML’s divided stance on lighting the lamp

A
Abdul Latheef Naha
‘Haram for one, halal for another’: Jaleel questions IUML’s divided stance on lighting the lamp
AI Summary

A public function has reignited a debate within the Indian Union Muslim League regarding the lighting of traditional ceremonial lamps. While some leaders participate in the practice as a cultural gesture, others view it as inconsistent with Islamic beliefs, drawing criticism from political rivals.

A public function attended by Minister for Industries P.K. Kunhalikutty and Minister for Local Self-Governments K.M. Shaji along with Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders in Thiruvananthapuram on Thursday (July 9, 2026) has revived the Indian Union Muslim League’s (IUML) long-running debate over the lighting of the traditional ceremonial lamp. When Mr. Shaji lit the ‘nilavilakku’, Mr. Kunhalikutty refused to do so.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicsculture

Get the full story

Sign up for Headlinne to unlock AI insights, political bias analysis, and your personalized news feed.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in