The Hindu·4 min read·hard

OpenAI vs ANI case: what it means for the future of information

E
Ebin K Gheevarghese
OpenAI vs ANI case: what it means for the future of information
AI Summary

The Delhi High Court ruled that OpenAI's use of ANI's content for training ChatGPT falls under fair dealing provisions of India's Copyright Act. The court found no evidence that the AI memorized or reproduced the agency's reporting, marking a significant legal precedent for AI training in India.

News agency Asian News International (ANI) sued AI research firm OpenAI in November 2024 for using its content to train ChatGPT without permission or payment. The generative-AI model allegedly hallucinated quotes and reports, wrongly attributing to the agency. The ANI, in its plea in Delhi High Court, has sought ₹2 crore in damages and an order barring OpenAI from using its work.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
technologybusinessai

Get the full story

Sign up for Headlinne to unlock AI insights, political bias analysis, and your personalized news feed.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in