Times of India·3 min read·medium

'Zealots overlooked human nature': Tharoor questions full Vande Mataram rendition

T
TOI NEWS DESK
'Zealots overlooked human nature': Tharoor questions full Vande Mataram rendition
AI Summary

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has criticized a new amendment requiring the full rendition of the Indian National Song at official functions. He argues that the extended duration of these ceremonies is impractical and may fail to foster genuine respect.

NEW DELHI: Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Tuesday questioned the practical implications of the Vande Mataram amendment, saying the requirement to sing the National Song in full at official functions could result in audiences standing for several minutes before and after events.In a post on X, Tharoor said the President had assented to the amendment, which was passed in Parliament without discussion. He said the amended provision requires the full National Song to be sung at the beginning and end of official functions, in addition to the National Anthem."The President has assented to the #VandeMataram Amendment, passed without discussion in Parliament, which requires the singing of the National Song in full at the start and ending of any official function, in addition to the National Anthem."As one who greatly respects both, and can sing the first two stanzas of the former (but not the other four, which were never required till now) as well as the entire anthem, i would like to point to just one practical consideration our zealots appear to have overlooked: human nature," Tharoor added.He said, "'Jana Gana Mana' requires audiences to stand respectfully and focus their attention for a reasonable 52 seconds. The National Song in full takes 3 minutes and 10 seconds. Tamil Nadu has just decided that both will be preceded by the State Song in Tamil for another 2 minutes. Do we really expect audiences to stand still and respectfully for six minutes before and after every function, a total of 12 extra minutes? Can respect and patience be legislated? I fear that the intent of the Bill, to promote greater respect for the National Song , will not be achieved, but its opposite may well be...."Tharoor said he respected both the National Anthem and National Song but questioned whether imposing longer ceremonial requirements would achieve the intended objective of promoting respect.He also pointed to Tamil Nadu's decision to precede both with its state song, arguing that the combined duration could require audiences to remain standing for around six minutes before and after official functions.Tharoor questioned whether respect and patience could be legislated and warned that the amendment could have the opposite effect of what it intends to achieve.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicscultureeducation

Get the full story

Sign up for Headlinne to unlock AI insights, political bias analysis, and your personalized news feed.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in